Page 27 and 28, have some very specific and notable achievements of the Communists have taken place by the time 2022 rolls around.
Nevertheless in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable.
- Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
- A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
- Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
- Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
- Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
- Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
- Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State: the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
- Equal obligation of all to labour. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
- Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries: gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country, by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.
- Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production.
Well, we know in the West; we have progressive tax systems, and every country in the world has a central bank. Number four most assuredly will be soon to come online if not already.
Did you know that the mayor of Ottawa wants to sell the trucks seized from the “occupation”?
An occupation doesn’t happen with patriots, it happens with rebels and those against the government.
You can’t deny that it’s there in black and white.
Again, what would a class struggle have to do with confiscation of property when Marx, says it needs to be destroyed?
This obviously has to do with control, and nothing to do with a class struggle.
Just an observation but how can property be taken away from emigrants when there are no countries and nationalities?
These are the things that make me question the whole point of this document.
The central bank is another odd one.
If wage-labour and creating capital is the bane of evil in the communist world why don’t they just outlaw money?
One very simple reason: power and control.
If you can control someone’s access to credit and money, as we have seen in the West, specifically with the “Freedom Convoy” , you can bend anyone to your will.
I am surprised that controlling the food supply never made the list.
You want to control people, control the food supply - you can thank Henry Kissinger for that one. I’m pretty sure he was a globalist.
Some of the other ones on this list are completed by a handful of companies owing a specific sector, communication, for instance.
Is this communist when the companies are for profit?
No, because like I said, I don’t believe this document has anything to do with communism, and everything to do with the globalist agenda.
Klaus Schwab calls it a public-private partnership.
Page 29 and beyond, Marx discusses the differences between his communism and the various socialisms and why his is better.
He is critical and luckily, at the end of each, he sums it up. In the end, I don’t think it matters much. We really care about what he wants to do.
By page 39, he’s finished and now discusses how the communists work in relation to other opposition parties.
“In short, the Communists everywhere support every revolutionary movement against the existing social and political order of things.”
Rather pragmatic don’t you think?
Support everything but have your own agenda.
“Finally, they labour everywhere for the union and agreement of the democratic parties of all countries.
The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions.
Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.
Working men of all countries unite!”
Marx did agree that peaceful means were preferable when available. I might add, it’s in the footnotes.
But as I’ve stated, you can’t just overthrow and have people accept it, you must use creeping incrementalism.
It’s slow, but by the time everyone knows what’s happening, it’s too late.
To quote Baron Zemo in Marvel’s Civil War
“An empire toppled by its enemies can rise again, but one which crumbles from within? That’s dead… forever”
So far the globalist are doing a fantastic job, as an aside, I think they over-played their hand over the last two years but the take away at least from what I can see is that The Communist Manifesto was never a critique on capitalism,
It’s advocating for an entirely new way for the world to work!
When we view the Communist Manifesto through the lens of “the globalist agenda”, it is very easy to see all the things going on in the world are driven from this document.
Marx outlines the game plan, and the endgame, and it’s so utterly different from what we’ve known for generations we won’t be able to imagine it.
I am sure an unfamiliar word will be invented to represent it, but for now all we can say is it will be a new society based on a new paradigm, and none of us can understand what that will really mean.